Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India
(2003) 2 SCC 45 · Supreme Court of India
Lawyers have no right to strike or give a call for boycott; courts must not adjourn merely because the Bar is on strike.
Unit I · Professional Ethics and Professional Accounting System
| Act / instrument | Section | Name |
|---|---|---|
| Advocates Act, 1961 | 29–30 | Advocates to be the only recognised class of persons entitled to practise; right to practise |
| Advocates Act, 1961 | 34 | Power of High Courts to make rules |
| Constitution of India | 19(1)(g) | Right to practise a profession, subject to reasonable restrictions |
(2003) 2 SCC 45 · Supreme Court of India
Lawyers have no right to strike or give a call for boycott; courts must not adjourn merely because the Bar is on strike.
(2011) 1 SCC 688 · Supreme Court of India
A Bar Association resolution refusing to defend a particular accused is unprofessional and unconstitutional.
(2001) 1 SCC 118 · Supreme Court of India
A client cannot be left without a remedy because the advocate joined a strike; absence on that ground is not a sufficient cause in itself.