{"version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1.1", "title": "OU LLB Companion \u2014 landmark cases", "home_page_url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/", "feed_url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/feeds/latest.json", "description": "Landmark case laws from the Osmania University LL.B. (3-YDC) syllabus.", "items": [{"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/state-of-maharashtra-v-champalal-punjaji-shah-moot-courts-internship-duty-to-the/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/state-of-maharashtra-v-champalal-punjaji-shah-moot-courts-internship-duty-to-the/", "title": "State of Maharashtra v. Champalal Punjaji Shah (1981) 3 SCC 610", "content_text": "An intern watching criminal work should note how delay is explained, opposed or waived.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/vinubhai-haribhai-malaviya-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-duty-to-the/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/vinubhai-haribhai-malaviya-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-duty-to-the/", "title": "Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat (2019) 17 SCC 1", "content_text": "Counsel assisting investigation or appearing at remand must not obstruct a magistrate's power to seek the truth.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ex-capt-harish-uppal-v-union-of-india-moot-courts-internship-chambers-court-and-/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ex-capt-harish-uppal-v-union-of-india-moot-courts-internship-chambers-court-and-/", "title": "Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45", "content_text": "Boycott of courts is illegal; an intern should still attend and record work done each day.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/rk-anand-v-delhi-high-court-moot-courts-internship-chambers-court-and-office-int/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/rk-anand-v-delhi-high-court-moot-courts-internship-chambers-court-and-office-int/", "title": "R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106", "content_text": "Tutoring witnesses, fixing cases or using publicity as a tool of litigation is misconduct.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/as-mohammed-rafi-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-moot-courts-internship-chambers-court-and/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/as-mohammed-rafi-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-moot-courts-internship-chambers-court-and/", "title": "A.S. Mohammed Rafi v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011) 1 SCC 688", "content_text": "Professional ethics require fearless representation, confidentiality and loyalty to the court as well as the client.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-pre-trial-con/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-pre-trial-con/", "title": "Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2004) 4 SCC 158", "content_text": "A prosecution that withholds or tames witnesses at the pre-trial stage cannot produce a fair trial.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/vinubhai-haribhai-malaviya-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-pre-trial-c/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/vinubhai-haribhai-malaviya-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-pre-trial-c/", "title": "Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat (2019) 17 SCC 1", "content_text": "Pre-trial judicial oversight of investigation is part of ensuring a full and fair prosecution brief.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/hussainara-khatoon-v-state-of-bihar-moot-courts-internship-first-information-inv/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/hussainara-khatoon-v-state-of-bihar-moot-courts-internship-first-information-inv/", "title": "Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81", "content_text": "Investigation and charge-sheet delay that leaves the accused in jail is a constitutional wrong.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/vinubhai-haribhai-malaviya-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-first-infor/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/vinubhai-haribhai-malaviya-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-first-infor/", "title": "Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat (2019) 17 SCC 1", "content_text": "A magistrate can order further investigation even after a report is filed, so that the truth-finding process is not frozen too early.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/state-of-maharashtra-v-champalal-punjaji-shah-moot-courts-internship-counsel-del/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/state-of-maharashtra-v-champalal-punjaji-shah-moot-courts-internship-counsel-del/", "title": "State of Maharashtra v. Champalal Punjaji Shah (1981) 3 SCC 610", "content_text": "Prejudice from delay is assessed with the length of delay, reasons, and the accused's assertion of the right.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/as-mohammed-rafi-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-moot-courts-internship-counsel-delay-and-/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/as-mohammed-rafi-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-moot-courts-internship-counsel-delay-and-/", "title": "A.S. Mohammed Rafi v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011) 1 SCC 688", "content_text": "Bar associations cannot forbid members from defending police or unpopular accused.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/hussainara-khatoon-v-state-of-bihar-moot-courts-internship-fair-trial-protection/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/hussainara-khatoon-v-state-of-bihar-moot-courts-internship-fair-trial-protection/", "title": "Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81", "content_text": "Undertrial prisoners cannot be warehoused without a speedy, legally aided trial.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-fair-trial-pr-2/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-fair-trial-pr-2/", "title": "Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2006) 3 SCC 374", "content_text": "Witness protection and a court that controls the process are conditions of a fair trial.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-fair-trial-pr/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-fair-trial-pr/", "title": "Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2004) 4 SCC 158", "content_text": "The Best Bakery retrial was ordered because witnesses were intimidated and the trial had become a mockery of justice.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/state-of-maharashtra-v-champalal-punjaji-shah-moot-courts-internship-evidence-ju/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/state-of-maharashtra-v-champalal-punjaji-shah-moot-courts-internship-evidence-ju/", "title": "State of Maharashtra v. Champalal Punjaji Shah (1981) 3 SCC 610", "content_text": "Unexplained delay that prejudices a fair trial can vitiate the proceeding.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-evidence-judg/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/zahira-habibullah-sheikh-v-state-of-gujarat-moot-courts-internship-evidence-judg/", "title": "Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2004) 4 SCC 158", "content_text": "A trial is not a sport; the court must ensure that evidence is recorded in an atmosphere free of intimidation.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-moot-courts-internship-from-institution-to-issues/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-moot-courts-internship-from-institution-to-issues/", "title": "Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan AIR 1954 SC 340", "content_text": "The observing student should note how jurisdiction is pleaded and tried, because a decree without jurisdiction is void.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-moot-courts-internship-from-institution/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-moot-courts-internship-from-institution/", "title": "Salem Advocate Bar Assn. v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 344", "content_text": "Civil trials are to be case-managed: service, amendment, ADR under s. 89 and time-bound steps.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/rk-anand-v-delhi-high-court-moot-courts-internship-courtroom-ethics-in-moots-and/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/rk-anand-v-delhi-high-court-moot-courts-internship-courtroom-ethics-in-moots-and/", "title": "R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106", "content_text": "An advocate is an officer of the court; sting-revealed misconduct justifies prohibition from appearing.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ex-capt-harish-uppal-v-union-of-india-moot-courts-internship-courtroom-ethics-in/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ex-capt-harish-uppal-v-union-of-india-moot-courts-internship-courtroom-ethics-in/", "title": "Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45", "content_text": "Lawyers have no right to strike or boycott court; the duty to the court and the client continues.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/rk-anand-v-delhi-high-court-moot-courts-internship-structure-of-a-memorial-and-o/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/rk-anand-v-delhi-high-court-moot-courts-internship-structure-of-a-memorial-and-o/", "title": "R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106", "content_text": "Trial by media and collusion with a defence witness destroy the fairness of the proceeding and amount to professional misconduct.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/as-mohammed-rafi-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-moot-courts-internship-structure-of-a-mem/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/as-mohammed-rafi-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-moot-courts-internship-structure-of-a-mem/", "title": "A.S. Mohammed Rafi v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011) 1 SCC 688", "content_text": "Every accused, however unpopular, has a right to counsel; a lawyer who refuses on moral grounds fails professional duty.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/bhagwati-prasad-v-chandramaul-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-section-89-settlem/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/bhagwati-prasad-v-chandramaul-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-section-89-settlem/", "title": "Bhagwati Prasad v. Chandramaul AIR 1966 SC 735", "content_text": "Once parties join issue, the court decides the real dispute, including terms they have in substance accepted.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-section/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-section/", "title": "Salem Advocate Bar Assn. v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 344", "content_text": "Section 89 and the 2002 amendments were upheld; courts must consider ADR and follow model case-management practice.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/mayar-hk-ltd-v-owners-parties-vessel-mv-fortune-express-drafting-pleadings-conve-3/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/mayar-hk-ltd-v-owners-parties-vessel-mv-fortune-express-drafting-pleadings-conve-3/", "title": "Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. v. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express (2006) 3 SCC 100", "content_text": "Pre-suit correspondence and notices form part of the narrative from which cause of action is read.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-statuto/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-statuto/", "title": "Salem Advocate Bar Assn. v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 344", "content_text": "Section 80 CPC is to be applied to advance justice; hyper-technical objections to notice should not defeat a just claim.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-mortgage-deed-and-le/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-mortgage-deed-and-le/", "title": "Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan AIR 1954 SC 340", "content_text": "A conveyance dispute decreed by a court that lacked jurisdiction does not settle title.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/church-of-north-india-v-lavajibhai-ratanjibhai-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-m/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/church-of-north-india-v-lavajibhai-ratanjibhai-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-m/", "title": "Church of North India v. Lavajibhai Ratanjibhai (2005) 10 SCC 760", "content_text": "An instrument that in substance creates an interest in immovable property must meet the form the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act require.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ramnik-vallabhdas-madhvani-v-taraben-pravinlal-madhvani-drafting-pleadings-conve-3/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ramnik-vallabhdas-madhvani-v-taraben-pravinlal-madhvani-drafting-pleadings-conve-3/", "title": "Ramnik Vallabhdas Madhvani v. Taraben Pravinlal Madhvani (2004) 1 SCC 460", "content_text": "Family and company property cannot be transferred by a person who has not pleaded and proved disposing power.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/church-of-north-india-v-lavajibhai-ratanjibhai-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-s/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/church-of-north-india-v-lavajibhai-ratanjibhai-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-s/", "title": "Church of North India v. Lavajibhai Ratanjibhai (2005) 10 SCC 760", "content_text": "A religious or corporate body can convey only through persons authorised by its constitution; unregistered documents do not pass title where registration is compulsory.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-set-off/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-set-off/", "title": "Salem Advocate Bar Assn. v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 344", "content_text": "Case-management timelines for written statements are to be taken seriously, subject to the ends of justice.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/mayar-hk-ltd-v-owners-parties-vessel-mv-fortune-express-drafting-pleadings-conve-2/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/mayar-hk-ltd-v-owners-parties-vessel-mv-fortune-express-drafting-pleadings-conve-2/", "title": "Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. v. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express (2006) 3 SCC 100", "content_text": "Whether a pleading discloses a defence or cause of action is judged on the document as a whole.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ramnik-vallabhdas-madhvani-v-taraben-pravinlal-madhvani-drafting-pleadings-conve-2/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/ramnik-vallabhdas-madhvani-v-taraben-pravinlal-madhvani-drafting-pleadings-conve-2/", "title": "Ramnik Vallabhdas Madhvani v. Taraben Pravinlal Madhvani (2004) 1 SCC 460", "content_text": "Defences and accounts must be pleaded with particularity if they are to support a different decree.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/bhagwati-prasad-v-chandramaul-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-written-statement-/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/bhagwati-prasad-v-chandramaul-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-written-statement-/", "title": "Bhagwati Prasad v. Chandramaul AIR 1966 SC 735", "content_text": "A defendant who knows the plaintiff's true case cannot later plead surprise on a technical want of form.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/church-of-north-india-v-lavajibhai-ratanjibhai-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-r/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/church-of-north-india-v-lavajibhai-ratanjibhai-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-r/", "title": "Church of North India v. Lavajibhai Ratanjibhai (2005) 10 SCC 760", "content_text": "Title claims depend on properly pleaded and proved documents of conveyance and constitution of the body that sues.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-return-of-plaint-doc/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-return-of-plaint-doc/", "title": "Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan AIR 1954 SC 340", "content_text": "Pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction go to the root; consent cannot confer jurisdiction where none exists.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-particulars-of-a-pla/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/kiran-singh-v-chaman-paswan-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-particulars-of-a-pla/", "title": "Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan AIR 1954 SC 340", "content_text": "A decree passed by a court without jurisdiction is a nullity and can be ignored in collateral proceedings.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/mayar-hk-ltd-v-owners-parties-vessel-mv-fortune-express-drafting-pleadings-conve/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/mayar-hk-ltd-v-owners-parties-vessel-mv-fortune-express-drafting-pleadings-conve/", "title": "Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. v. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express (2006) 3 SCC 100", "content_text": "A plaint is rejected under O. 7 r. 11 only if, on a meaningful reading, it discloses no cause of action.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/bhagwati-prasad-v-chandramaul-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-striking-out-amend/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/bhagwati-prasad-v-chandramaul-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-striking-out-amend/", "title": "Bhagwati Prasad v. Chandramaul AIR 1966 SC 735", "content_text": "Amendment and issues should ensure that the real controversy is tried, not that a party is taken by surprise.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}, {"id": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-strikin/", "url": "https://www.ilakhatamafaliya.com/case/salem-advocate-bar-assn-v-union-of-india-drafting-pleadings-conveyancing-strikin/", "title": "Salem Advocate Bar Assn. v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 344", "content_text": "The proviso to O. 6 r. 17 restricts late amendment after trial has commenced save where due diligence is shown.", "authors": [{"name": "Supreme Court of India"}]}]}