R.K. Garg, Advocate v. State of Himachal Pradesh
(1981) 3 SCC 166 · Supreme Court of India
Throwing a file at the court and using abusive language is criminal contempt and a blot on professional ethics; apology is not a universal solvent.
Unit III · Professional Ethics and Professional Accounting System
| Act / instrument | Section | Name |
|---|---|---|
| Bar Council of India Rules | Part VI, Ch. II, s. I | Duty to the court |
| Bar Council of India Rules | Part VI, Ch. II, s. II | Duty to the client |
| Advocates Act, 1961 | 7(1)(b) | BCI's function to lay down standards of professional conduct |
(1981) 3 SCC 166 · Supreme Court of India
Throwing a file at the court and using abusive language is criminal contempt and a blot on professional ethics; apology is not a universal solvent.
(2001) 2 SCC 221 · Supreme Court of India
An advocate who misleads the court or makes reckless allegations against a judge invites disciplinary and contempt consequences.
AIR 1979 SC 281 · Supreme Court of India
Returning the brief at the last moment so as to leave the client undefended is professional misconduct.