Mardia Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India
(2004) 4 SCC 311 · Supreme Court of India
SARFAESI was largely upheld; the condition of depositing 75 per cent before the DRT could entertain an appeal was struck down as onerous.
Unit V · Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments
| Act / instrument | Section | Name |
|---|---|---|
| Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 | 13 | Enforcement of security interest |
| Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 | 14 | Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate to assist taking possession |
| Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 | 17 | Application against measures to recover secured debt |
| Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 | 18 | Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal |
(2004) 4 SCC 311 · Supreme Court of India
SARFAESI was largely upheld; the condition of depositing 75 per cent before the DRT could entertain an appeal was struck down as onerous.
(2010) 8 SCC 110 · Supreme Court of India
Writ courts should not interdict SARFAESI recovery when an efficacious statutory appeal under section 17 is available.
(2013) 9 SCC 620 · Supreme Court of India
Section 14 assistance for possession is a ministerial statutory power; the magistrate is not to adjudicate the bank's claim on merits.