Landmark case · Land Laws · Semester 4
Union of India v. Tarsem Singh
(2019) 9 SCC 304 · Supreme Court of India
Solatium and interest cannot be denied to a class of acquisitions without a rational basis; parity in compensation principles applies.
From topic
RFCTLARR procedure, award, rehabilitation and lapse — Unit III, Land Laws.
Related sections:
- Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 11 — Publication of preliminary notification
- Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 24 — Land acquisition process under Act No. 1 of 1894 deemed to have lapsed in certain cases
- Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 26–30 — Determination of market value and solatium
- Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 31 — Rehabilitation and resettlement award