Landmark case · Land Laws · Semester 4

Pune Municipal Corporation v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki

(2014) 3 SCC 183 · Supreme Court of India

The Court had held that non-payment of compensation into the landowners' account could trigger lapse under section 24(2) (later overruled on this aspect).

From topic

RFCTLARR procedure, award, rehabilitation and lapse — Unit III, Land Laws.

Related sections:

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 11 — Publication of preliminary notification
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 24 — Land acquisition process under Act No. 1 of 1894 deemed to have lapsed in certain cases
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 26–30 — Determination of market value and solatium
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, 31 — Rehabilitation and resettlement award