Landmark case · Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments · Semester 5

Bridgestone India (P) Ltd. v. Inderpal Singh

(2016) 2 SCC 75 · Supreme Court of India

After the 2015 amendment, the court where the payee's bank branch is situated has jurisdiction to try a section 138 complaint.

From topic

Related sections:

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, 138 proviso — Presentation, notice and fifteen days for payment
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, 142(2) — Territorial jurisdiction after the 2015 amendment
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, 148 — Power of appellate court to order deposit pending appeal